You are here

Effects of the FecL major gene in the Lacaune meat sheep population.

TitleEffects of the FecL major gene in the Lacaune meat sheep population.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsMartin, P, Raoul, J, Bodin, L
JournalGenet Sel Evol
Date Published2014 Aug 12
KeywordsAlleles, Animals, Breeding, Female, Fertility, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotyping Techniques, Homozygote, Litter Size, Male, Meat, Pedigree, Sheep

BACKGROUND: The major prolificacy gene FecL was first described in the Lacaune sheep meat breed Ovi-Test in 1998. A few studies estimated the effect of this gene on prolificacy but little data is available. In 2010, the Ovi-Test cooperative started genotyping FecL in all of their replacement ewe lambs. Thanks to the large amount of genotyping data that is available now, gene effects on litter size and other relevant traits can be estimated more accurately.METHODS: Our study included 5775 ewes genotyped since 2010 and 1025 sires genotyped since 2002. Performances and pedigrees were extracted from the French national database for genetic evaluation and research. Analysis of the effect of the gene on different traits was based on linear or threshold genetic animal models using the ASReml software.RESULTS: The female population was composed of 71% homozygous wild type ewes (++), 27% heterozygous ewes for the FecL mutation (L+) and 2% homozygous mutant (LL) ewes. On average, L + ewes produced 0.5 more lambs per lambing than ++ ewes. The FecL gene not only affected the mean litter size but also its variability, which was lower for ++ than for L + ewes. Fertility after insemination was higher for L + ewes than for ++ ewes. Lambs from ++ dams were heavier (+300 g) than the lambs of L + dams and the mortality of twin lambs born from ++ dams was lower than those from L + dams. In addition, bias in estimated breeding values for prolificacy when ignoring the existence of this major gene was quantified.CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the FecL gene on prolificacy was estimated more accurately and we show that this gene affects both the mean and the variability of litter size and other traits. This paper also shows that ignoring the existence of this major gene in genetic evaluation of prolificacy can lead to a large overestimation of polygenic breeding values.

Alternate JournalGenet. Sel. Evol.
PubMed ID25158754
PubMed Central IDPMC4237826