Publications
Found 10 results
Filters: Author is Misztal, I [Clear All Filters]
Nonparallel genome changes within subpopulations over time contributed to genetic diversity within the US Holstein population. J Dairy Sci. 2023. doi:10.3168/jds.2022-21914.
Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor. J Dairy Sci. 2022. doi:10.3168/jds.2021-21505.
Modeling genetic differences of combined broiler chicken populations in single-step GBLUP. J Anim Sci. 2021. doi:10.1093/jas/skab056.
. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(11):10012-10019. doi:10.3168/jds.2019-16262.
. Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(3):2336-2346. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15434.
. Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection. Animal. 2017;11(5):731-736. doi:10.1017/S1751731116002366.
. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(1):49-52. doi:10.2527/jas.2016.0699.
Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(6):2653-62. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8836.
Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(6):4090-4. doi:10.3168/jds.2014-9125.
Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3943-52. doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7752.
.