Publications
Found 20 results
Filters: Author is Vitezica, Zulma G [Clear All Filters]
Impact of interpopulation distance on dominance variance and average heterosis in hybrid populations within species. Genetics. 2023;224(2). doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad059.
. Computing strategies for multi-population genomic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 2022;54(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12711-022-00705-x.
. Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2467:219-243. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_8.
. Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China. Genet Sel Evol. 2022;54(1):69. doi:10.1186/s12711-022-00760-4.
. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture. Genet Sel Evol. 2022;54(1):19. doi:10.1186/s12711-022-00709-7.
. The correlation of substitution effects across populations and generations in the presence of nonadditive functional gene action. Genetics. 2021. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab138.
. Estimating inbreeding depression for growth and reproductive traits using pedigree and genomic methods in Argentinean Brangus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2021. doi:10.1093/jas/skab289.
. Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis. Genetics. 2021. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab026.
Association analysis of loci implied in "buffering" epistasis. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(3). doi:10.1093/jas/skaa045.
Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(1). doi:10.1093/jas/skz384.
. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(8):2829-2841. doi:10.1534/g3.120.401376.
. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models. Genet Sel Evol. 2018;50(1):71. doi:10.1186/s12711-018-0437-3.
. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(10):4028-4034. doi:10.1093/jas/sky275.
. Genomic selection models for directional dominance: an example for litter size in pigs. Genet Sel Evol. 2018;50(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12711-018-0374-1.
. Non-additive Effects in Genomic Selection. Front Genet. 2018;9:78. doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00078.
. Influence of epistasis on response to genomic selection using complete sequence data. Genet Sel Evol. 2017;49(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0340-3.
. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs. Genet Sel Evol. 2016;48(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0185-1.
. Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships. Genetics. 2015;200(2):455-68. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.177014.
. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:89. doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0165-x.
. Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker. Genetics. 2015;199(3):675-81. doi:10.1534/genetics.114.173559.