Publications
Found 84 results
Filters: Keyword is Male [Clear All Filters]
Disentangling the dynamics of energy allocation to develop a proxy for robustness of fattening pigs. Genet Sel Evol. 2023;55(1):77. doi:10.1186/s12711-023-00851-w.
. Fine characterization and microbiota assessment as keys to understanding the positive effect of standardized natural citrus extract on broiler chickens. J Anim Sci. 2023;101. doi:10.1093/jas/skad069.
Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders. Genet Sel Evol. 2023;55(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2.
. An ancient truncated duplication of the anti-Müllerian hormone receptor type 2 gene is a potential conserved master sex determinant in the Pangasiidae catfish family. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022;22(6):2411-2428. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13620.
Generation of a chromosome-level genome assembly for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and characterization of its sex-determining genomic region. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022;22(7):2685-2700. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13641.
Maternal dietary methionine restriction alters the expression of energy metabolism genes in the duckling liver. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):407. doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08634-1.
Robustness scores in fattening pigs based on routinely collected phenotypes: determination and genetic parameters. J Anim Sci. 2022;100(5). doi:10.1093/jas/skac157.
. Dissecting genetic trends to understand breeding practices in livestock: a maternal pig line example. Genet Sel Evol. 2021;53(1):89. doi:10.1186/s12711-021-00683-6.
. A supernumerary "B-sex" chromosome drives male sex determination in the Pachón cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus. Curr Biol. 2021;31(21):4800-4809.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.030.
Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(1). doi:10.1093/jas/skz384.
. Whole-genome sequencing of European autochthonous and commercial pig breeds allows the detection of signatures of selection for adaptation of genetic resources to different breeding and production systems. Genet Sel Evol. 2020;52(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12711-020-00553-7.
Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits. Animal. 2019;13(11):2429-2439. doi:10.1017/S1751731119001046.
. Effect of feed restriction on the environmental variability of birth weight in divergently selected lines of mice. Genet Sel Evol. 2019;51(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12711-019-0471-9.
. Genetic parameters for first lactation dairy traits in the Alpine and Saanen goat breeds using a random regression test-day model. Genet Sel Evol. 2019;51(1):43. doi:10.1186/s12711-019-0485-3.
. Genotype by environment interactions for performance and thermoregulation responses in growing pigs1,2. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(9):3699-3713. doi:10.1093/jas/skz245.
Influence of the corn form in the diet and length of fasting before slaughter on the performance of overfed mule ducks. Poult Sci. 2019;98(2):753-760. doi:10.3382/ps/pey432.
. Relationships between body reserve dynamics and rearing performances in meat ewes1. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(10):4076-4084. doi:10.1093/jas/skz273.
. Analysis of Meiotic Segregation Pattern and Interchromosomal Effects in a Bull Heterozygous for a 3/16 Robertsonian Translocation. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2018;156(4):197-203. doi:10.1159/000494289.
Intraindividual Variation of Meiotic Recombination Parameters in Pig Spermatocytes: A Preliminary Study. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2018;154(4):229-233. doi:10.1159/000488789.
Optimal mating strategies to manage a heterozygous advantage major gene in sheep. Animal. 2018;12(3):454-463. doi:10.1017/S1751731117001835.
. Embryonic environment and transgenerational effects in quail. Genet Sel Evol. 2017;49(1):14. doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0292-7.
Estimates of the actual relationship between half-sibs in a pig population. J Anim Breed Genet. 2017;134(2):109-118. doi:10.1111/jbg.12236.
Estimation of genetic parameters for resistance to gastro-intestinal nematodes in pure blood Arabian horses. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45(4):237-42. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.11.003.
. Quantitative feed restriction rather than caloric restriction modulates the immune response of growing rabbits. J Nutr. 2015;145(3):483-9. doi:10.3945/jn.114.197871.
Third Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2015. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;145(2):78-179. doi:10.1159/000430927.